COMPARISON

Otto Roles vs LazyApply

Automation that applies to jobs on Greenhouse, Dice, Indeed and ZipRecruiter in bulk.

The difference that matters most

LazyApply: Submits automatically — the plans are sold by daily volume, up to 1,500 applications a day.

Otto: searches 685,153 live openings from your CV, verifies each posting is still accepting applications, scores fit against the full job description, and fills the form itself — declining to answer anything you never told it.

What LazyApply does well

• It genuinely submits, which most tools in this category do not
• Volume is the explicit product: if you want 100+ applications out this week, it will do that
• 30-day money-back guarantee

If the list above describes what you need, use LazyApply. A comparison page that cannot name a competitor's strengths is an advert.

Where Otto differs

• The two products disagree about what the job is. LazyApply optimises for applications sent; Otto optimises for applications worth sending, and will show you fewer roles on purpose.
• Otto scores fit against the full job description and drops anything below the bar rather than filling the quota.
• Otto applies once per employer per batch. Volume tools do not, which is what makes a recruiter recognise a spray.

Pricing

LazyApply: Basic $99/yr (15 applications/day), Premium $149/yr (150/day), Ultimate $999/yr (1,500/day). Checked 28 August 2026 — verify on their site before deciding.

Everything stated here about LazyApply was taken from their own public pages on 28 August 2026. Products change; tell us if anything is out of date.